Has anyone had a look at this? http://www.caradvice.com.au/388419/ute- ... -amarok-2/
Interesting comparison and they are still drooling over the Ranger. The Amarok is also highly rated though I have heard there are issues emerging with them. And they are old now. Some of these utes are viewed with rose coloured lenses for sure.
The issues with the triton really are that the stock suspension is rubbish and they had issues with the steering. I have heard other have issues with the triton steering too. MN and MQ though I really like the steering in my MN. All other things can be attributed to the fact that Mitsubishi seam to aim for bottom rung on price point. Also the tow bar was very low and made contact with the ground. Some in the comparison didn't even have a towbar so to get marked down for that was weird.
With most of those utes people tend to change the suspension to suit needs anyway. Extra lift or to suit towing. I am biased for sure but the Triton didn't deserve such a low rating. With the money you save off the lot you can fix the problems and end up with a ute better than the others for sure.