Well What a mixed bag of Information and in the end it is leaning towards the 2.5l.
. I gather the alot of people will look at it as inferior????? Small engine CC's v's the 3.2! You have Rick stating that its a bit of a goer in UK variant, the 2.5l, liked it afterwards, and Liamb not keen on a smaller cc 2.5l and fairly sure that smaller cc's dont (might not) cut it regardless. I hear everyone and what gets me is that how the preverbial can a car company head down the way of lets say Nissan, surely they should know the problems that have been caused and not taken a different direction???
. I am fairly new to the site and in general to the Triton, but if Mits has issues regarding emission's blah blah, why not try to compromise like a 2.7,2.8 or a 2.9ish sized model that surely should help in many area's for both company and consumer, especially after a Navara lesson.
But the main fundemental thing it that its a let down(if 2.5l) to have clearly the better 4x4 in the market with a questionable drive train. It is somewhat disappointing
. Unless this claimed 2.5l out performs expectations over a period of time, this could back fire. Side tracking here, but if memory serves me right, Mercedes owns a chunk of Mitsubishi, I do know that MB did have a 2.7l and a 2.8l sized deisel engine, the 2.7l has 130ish Kw and nearly 400 Nm,
, that should have solved alot of problems for a long time, but what would I know, I dont build cars and dont work at either. I can hold my head high still knowing that at least the Triton is still very safe and ....................had good pedigree
Cheers and hoping.......
Nuri