boycee wrote: extra 700mm on the tub made the departure angles shithouse.
boycee wrote:I wish i was there to ask the questions the people there just don't have the same passion for the tri as me. guess we will have to wait for the next issue of the 4x4 mags to find out the details.
They replaced the rear bar and I know that cost them $1000.00 :o
boycee wrote:They replaced the rear bar and I know that cost them $1000.00
boycee wrote:
They ones I saw are now off to the wrecking yards as they drove them 100m into the salty water of the lake.
Dylan 191 wrote:boycee wrote:
They ones I saw are now off to the wrecking yards as they drove them 100m into the salty water of the lake.
boycee wrote:I went to mount Ive station on the weekend (just near lake Gairdner).
And to my surprise on the way there i saw the two new MN triton's. When I arrived at the station the manager told me overlander, 4x4 aust and other journalists where there testing them and a new outlander.
So they went out in the hills and as we all predicted the extra 700mm on the tub made the departure angles shithouse. theymanaged to rip the rear step off and had to fly in a new one for the photo shoots.
The triton does look good and i am told it performs really well too. 2.5l.
They ones I saw are now off to the wrecking yards as they drove them 100m into the salty water of the lake.
The oldman took some photos so i will get them up as soon as i can.
boycee wrote:thats what i reckon too. if you need a longer tub during the week bolt it on and then go 4wding with the shorter.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests